Effect of the Pedagogical Use of ChatGPT on Vocabulary Acquisition in 10th-Grade Basic Education Stu-dents: A Mixed Study with Repeated Measures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21955499Keywords:
artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, receptive vocabulary, basic education, language teachingAbstract
This study evaluated the effect of the peda-gogical use of ChatGPT on receptive vocabulary acquisition among tenth-grade students in a rural Ecuadorian school. A quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent groups, pretest and posttest was applied to a sample of 15 students: seven in the experimental group and eight in the control group. The experimental group worked for one week with guided activities supported by ChatGPT, focused on meaning recognition, con-textualized word use, synonyms, antonyms, and short written production; the control group con-tinued with regular instruction. The results showed slight increases in both groups. The ex-perimental group moved from a mean score of 21.00 to 21.43 points, while the control group increased from 20.88 to 22.00 points. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney U tests did not show statisti-cally significant differences either within groups or between them. It is concluded that, in this brief and contextualized application, ChatGPT did not produce a significant differential improvement compared with regular instruction, although no decline was observed in the experimental group.
Downloads
References
Abdelhalim, S. y Alsehibany, R. (2025). Integrating ChatGPT for vocabulary learning and retention: A classroom-based study of Saudi EFL learners. Language Learning & Technology, 29(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73635
Akgun, S. y Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2, 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
Alvarado, R., Alvarado, S., Govea, D. y Jaime, D. (2025). Impacto de la educación digital en las zonas rurales de Ecuador: Retos y oportunidades. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 4, 468. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025468
Chounta, I., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A. y Pedaste, M. (2021). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5
Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S., Gašević, D. y Siemens, G. (2024). Impact of AI assistance on student agency. Computers & Education, 210, 104967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104967
Durazno, B., Díaz, K. y Zambrano, J. (2025). Exploring the effect of ChatGPT as an educational tool to improve vocabulary acquisition in the English language. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(1), 4874–4886. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i1.16190
Fritz, C., Morris, P. y Richler, J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338
García, M. (2024). Inteligencia artificial y léxico: Una propuesta con ChatGPT para niveles B1 y B2 en la enseñanza del español como lengua extranjera. RILEX. Revista sobre Investigaciones Léxicas, 7(3), e9111. https://doi.org/10.17561/rilex.7.3.9111
Kim, N. y Kim, M. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 755914. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. y Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Li, B., Lowell, V. L., Wang, C. y Li, X. (2024). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266
Luo, Y., Yang, M. y Zhang, X. (2021). The effect of vocabulary depth and breadth on English listening comprehension can depend on how comprehension is measured. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 657573. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657573
Márquez, N., Guamán, I. y Peñafiel, R. (2025). Entre la innovación y la cautela: Voces docentes sobre la inteligencia artificial en la educación secundaria. South American Research Journal, 5(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15659239
McGrath, C., Cerratto Pargman, T., Juth, N. y Palmgren, P. (2023). University teachers’ perceptions of responsibility and artificial intelligence in higher education: An experimental philosophical study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100139
Morocho, R., Cartuche, A., Tipan, A., Guevara, A. y Ríos, M. (2023). Integración de la inteligencia artificial en la educación. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(6), 2032–2053. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i6.8832
Mugableh, A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on the development of vocabulary knowledge of Saudi EFL students. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on ChatGPT, 265–281. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.18
Nazaretsky, T., Ariely, M., Cukurova, M. y Alexandron, G. (2022). Teachers’ trust in AI-powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13232
Peñafiel, R., Márquez, N. y Guamán, I. (2024). Inteligencia artificial en la educación: Revisión sistemática de perspectivas, beneficios y desafíos en la práctica docente. South American Research Journal, 4(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14507789
Pratama, M., Sampelolo, R. y Lura, H. (2023). Revolutionizing education: Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence for personalized learning. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 5(2), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.2656-9914
Shadish, W., Cook, T. y Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
Sumakul, D., Hamied, F. y Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in EFL classrooms: Friend or foe? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232–256. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 5.0. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/handbooks/
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S. y Li, L. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhang, P. y Tur, G. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K-12 education. European Journal of Education, 59(2), e12599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Coraima Lizbeth Armijos-Guamán, Isabel Petita Guamán-Villa, Ruth Elizabeth Peñafiel-Jurado, Carlos Iván Andrade-Bayona

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


